Tag Cannabis

Medical marijuana dispensary begs city to lay off

During what is traditionally a short ceremonial meeting to install Walnut Creek’s newest mayor, supporters of the city’s first medical marijuana dispensary decided to protest the city’s ongoing legal battle against it.

Members of the C3 Collective, working from a storefront on Oakland Boulevard to provide medical marijuana to its members, asked Tuesday night that the city ease up on its efforts to close the dispensary, which opened last summer.

The nonprofit is hit with $500 in zoning violation fines every day it’s open.

“By prosecuting this facility, you are in turn inhibiting and neglecting community growth,” said Brian Hyman, executive director and CEO of C3. “I try and meet your fine requests. It’s not feasible every day.”

Walnut Creek officials say the dispensary’s operation is prohibited because marijuana is illegal under federal law. According to an injunction filed in Contra Costa County Superior Court on Nov. 9, the collective is also in violation of Walnut Creek zoning laws. A dispensary, like a pharmacy, is prohibited where the collective operates.

The city sued the collective in October in an effort to shut down the dispensary; the first hearing in that case is in March. The city filed the injunction hoping to force C3 to close even sooner, but the injunction hearing isn’t until Feb. 25.

Supporters of the collective urged the council Tuesday to hold off the court case and allow patients to go to C3 until the council makes a decision about allowing and regulating dispensaries in Walnut Creek. City staff members are currently studying the issue.

Gary Skrel, who a half-hour later turned over reins as mayor to Sue Rainey, told the group that Tuesday’s meeting was unlike others, more of a celebration for the mayor’s appointment. He asked if they wanted to proceed anyway and speak, and seven chose to.

Bruce Reckel told the council he needs medical marijuana to function.

“The medication I receive there “… allows me to go to functions like this,” he said. “I hope that you would support the collective and support us by ending this lawsuit.”

Scot Candell, attorney for the collective, said Tuesday the city has spent $20,000 to $30,000 on the suit.

“The city is suing the collective. The collective is made up of patients, so basically the city is suing the patients,” Candell said. “I know this is (a) ceremonial (meeting) and everyone will go and have cocktails and everyone will live happily ever after, but hopefully once we start a new session this will be an issue that you can consider.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Cannabis Science Begins National Television Educational Series Today With Traders Nation Airing National Tomorrow On CNN, ABC, Fox, CBS Marketwatch, And CNBC, Focusing On Educating Viewers On The Ground-Breaking Science of Medical Cannabis

14 January, 22:19, by admin Tags: , ,

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. — Cannabis Science Inc. (NASD OTCBB: CBIS), an emerging pharmaceutical cannabis company, is pleased to announce today that it has launched an Educational Series of Television commercials designed to inform its viewers about the importance of groundbreaking cannabis-based medicines. The Company is producing 10-15 different public service announcements in the series. Each one will cover a different topic, such as new break-through research developments, and tracking current and future cannabis medicines going through the FDA process. As well, the series will cover the commercialization of medical marijuana through licensed dispensaries, plus patient interviews about cannabis uses and life experiences, government legal issues and legalization progress tracking, as well as interviews with Doctors, patients, law makers and activists.

The educational campaign began today with a Traders Nation interview with Cannabis Science President and CEO, Dr. Robert Melamede on Traders Nation(tm). The initial taped interview aired live today at 12:40 pm ET. (Please click: http://www.tradersnation.com/player/?id=187 to view the rebroadcast of today’s show.) Guests on Traders Nation(tm) have included Steve Forbes, President and CEO of Forbes Inc., Country Music Legend, Willie Nelson, Ken Fisher, best selling book author and many others. Beginning later today, this interview will be made available on the www.cannabisscience.com website for free access to viewers worldwide. The rest of the educational series will also be made available on the website as released.

Trader’s Nation is the largest syndicated smallcap market program running, broadcasting daily 12p-1p ET. The show is syndicated nationwide airing on 42 cable television affiliates. Trader’s Nation is the only financial talk show pre-loaded in Apple’s iTunes software. Its reports are carried on major networks such as CNN, ABC, Fox, CBSMarket Watch, and CNBC. Traders Nation(tm) also retains the largest market share demographically, in 42 national markets, for smallcap talk cable and television. Traders Nation satellite and television schedule (6:00am ET – Morning Show): http://www.pmisyndication.com/programs/2007_2008/amg1130rev.php

Dr. Melamede, retired Chairman of the Biology Department at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, emphasized the wide variety of ailments that are currently being treated with cannabis as medical marijuana. He explained, “Cannabis Science Inc, as its name implies, is using the latest scientific techniques to develop standardized cannabis extracts that can be used in a variety of ways to help patients.” He emphasized that Cannabis Science is a “patient oriented company” that works closely with the medical marijuana movement, observing what people need and what works best for them. He added, “We look forward to working with our producers and creative team to make the Television series and our website CannabisScience.com into the leading source of information on the Science of Medical Cannabis.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Cannabis reclassification in the United Kingdom

01 January, 13:50, by admin Tags:

Cannabis reclassification in the United Kingdom refers to the transfer of cannabis[1] to a different class of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. As Home Secretary in Tony Blair’s Labour government, David Blunkett announced in 2001 that cannabis would be transferred from class B of the Act to class C, removing the threat of arrest for possession. Arrest would still be possible for distribution, however[2]. The transfer eventually happened in January 2004, after class C penalties for distribution had been stiffened. The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs had recommended such a reclassification as early as 1979, a view endorsed by the Runciman Report[3] in 1999.

The change was designed to enable police forces to concentrate resources on other (more serious) offences, including those involving “harder drugs”. The government stated that the reclassification of cannabis to class C had the desired effect, with arrests for cannabis possession falling by one third in the first year following, saving an estimated 199,000 police hours[4]. When the change was introduced, there were several attempts to establish Dutch-style cannabis cafes.

Criticism
In 2003, the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) criticised the United Kingdom for considering reclassification of cannabis from class B to C. The INCB’s annual report warned that:

The reclassification of cannabis by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Briton [sic] and Northern Ireland would undermine the efforts of the Governments of African countries to counter illicit cannabis cultivation, trafficking, and abuse.
Philip O. Emafo, INCB chairman, said:

It is important that consensus prevails in international drug control. No government should take unilateral measures without considering the impact of its actions and ultimately the consequences for an entire system that took governments almost a century to establish.
During the 2005 general election, Blair announced that the reclassification of cannabis from class B to C would be reviewed in light of new scientific research, and the issue was referred to the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs.

[edit] Return to class B
Early in January 2006 Charles Clarke, the Home Secretary, said that on the basis of advice from the Advisory Council, a decision was made not to return cannabis to class B.[5] However, during Prime Minister’s Questions on July 18 2007, new Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced that the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, was reviewing again whether to return cannabis to class B status.[6][7] On 7 May 2008, Smith confirmed that cannabis in the UK would again be classified as a class B drug, despite the Advisory Council’s recommendation.[8] On 26 January 2009, cannabis was reclassified as a class B drug.[9] The reclassification of cannabis to a class B drug had been hinted at as early as 2005 by allies of Gordon Brown, on the election night in 2005, Ed Balls stated that cannabis and the war in Iraq were mistakes that the Labour party had to learn from.[10]

As of yet, the government have not given a legitimate reason as to why cannabis, amongst others, is a class B drug (beyond giving out a message – “that is not unacceptable”). From the home office website,[11], they claim that there is a new potent form of cannabis called skunk, which apparently “is a much stronger version of the drug”. Gordon Brown claims that this new type “which accounts for 80% of cannabis available on our streets” is “lethal”. [12] There is no scientific backing for these claims or justifications and it is noted that one of the earliest strains of skunk to appear was that of “SKUNK #1″, which has been inbred since 1978. [13]. After the sacking of Professor David Nutt, 5 other members of the ACMD resigned in protest.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Cannabis is stronger, but users smoke less

31 December, 09:43, by admin Tags: , ,

A more potent “skunk” form of cannabis now accounts for 70-80% of the British market for the drug, but many users are cutting down and only smoking enough to get high, the initial results of a Home Office study show.

A special meeting of the government’s expert committee on drugs which is looking again at the legal status of cannabis was told by Dr Les King that the rise in the use of “homegrown skunk” – which accounted for 15% of the market in 2002 against 70% now – had been driven by the growth of “cannabis factories” run by organised crime gangs, who were often Vietnamese.

He said British-grown skunk had almost squeezed traditional imported herbal cannabis out of the market with cannabis resin mostly from Morocco still holding about 20% of British sales.

King, a technical adviser to the Home Office scientific development branch, said the skunk has an average THC content – the active ingredient in a joint – of about 12% to 14%, two and a half times that of traditional cannabis resin. He compared it to the difference in strength between beer and wine and said the amount smoked was as important as strength.

He was supported in his claim that users were moderating their intake of the more powerful cannabis by Dr Mike White from the Forensic Science Service who said it was rare for a smoker to get through an entire joint in one go. He also suggested that the potency of British skunk had actually fallen by 10% in the past two years as growers substituted quantity for quality in the face of an expanding market.

King said media reports were wrong to claim that a new “superskunk” form of cannabis 10 to 20 times stronger than traditional types was now sweeping the British market.

The two-day meeting of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs opened with its chairman, Sir Michael Rawlins, saying he had accepted a written assurance from the home secretary, Jacqui Smith, that the government still had an open mind over regrading cannabis from class C back to class B, which would again make possession punishable with a jail sentence.

Ipsos Mori polling evidence published last night exploded the myth that the downgrading of the drug’s status by David Blunkett in 2004 had led to confusion about its status, with over 80% of those polled correctly saying the drug was still illegal. British Crime Survey data shows that cannabis consumption has fallen since the change.

The two-day meeting also heard evidence from the government’s mental health tsar, Professor Louis Appleby, that a link between cannabis and mental illness was not yet proven. But he backed reclassification, saying there was now sufficient evidence that cannabis was a harmful drug that could contribute to a pattern of relapse and risk in mental health patients.

Appleby said he felt that many health professionals had been guilty of complacency on the issue and that reclassification would reinforce the public health message. However he had reservations about further criminalising mental health patients for using cannabis.

The scientific experts also heard calls for regrading from the Association of Chief Police Officers, which argued that the emergence of British cannabis farms and confusion over its legal status on the streets justified tightening the law.

The Home Office study now under way is the first time that there has been a concerted attempt to find out what strength and type of cannabis is actually available on the street. Police forces across the country have been asked to send up to 1,000 samples of cannabis confiscated in stop and search operations to the Home Office for analysis. King, who is the technical adviser to the six-week study, said the initial findings were based on “several hundred” samples.

The Home Office-funded study is to report to the advisory council and the home secretary in March before the government decides whether or not to regrade cannabis in April.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Inside Holland’s “Half Baked” Pot Policy

30 December, 20:45, by admin Tags: , ,

When it comes to the debate over legalizing marijuana, even the president of the United States has a hard time keeping a straight face.

After legalization questions got high ratings in an online town hall in March, Mr. Obama couldn’t suppress a grin and a joke about what the popularity of the topic “says about the online audience.” To the disappointment, if not the surprise, of marijuana advocates, he went on to say that he doesn’t think legalizing and taxing marijuana “is a good strategy to grow our economy.”

Yet there are many Americans – and public officials – who are taking the issue more seriously. In a CBS News poll released Monday, 41 percent of Americans said they favor marijuana legalization. Other polls put that figure as high as 52 percent.

Meanwhile, Reps. Barney Frank and Ron Paul co-authored a bill to end federal penalties for possession of small amounts of pot. Sen. Jim Webb has put forth legislation to create a commission examining drug policy and problems in the criminal justice system.

In California, Assemblyman Tom Ammiano introduced a bill to legalize recreational use of the drug in order to generate desperately-needed tax revenue – and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger says he is open to a debate over doing just that.

These are significant steps for American politicians, who have long been loath to take on drug legalization for fear of being labeled soft on crime. But they mark little more than an early effort to prompt discussion around the issue.

For a more substantive look at how politicians are grappling with decriminalization, one must cross the Atlantic and take a look at Holland, where casual marijuana use has been de facto legal since 1976.

Where Pot Is Both Legal And Illegal:

Despite what the typical backpack-toting college student might think, pot exists in something of a legal netherworld even in Amsterdam. While coffee shops in some areas of the country can sell marijuana without risk of punishment, proprietors cannot legally obtain the product for sale. And possession and production are technically misdemeanors that can prompt a fine.

“The Dutch model is a little half baked,” quips Tim Boekhout van Solinge, a drug policy expert at the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands. “The supply side is still illegal, the production is illegal.”

Experts on both sides of the issue lament the ambiguity of marijuana policy not just in Holland but also in places like California, where there are not clear rules about the distribution of medical marijuana.

Dutch drug policy is grounded in the separation of soft drugs like marijuana from harder drugs like cocaine and heroin. “The policy has evolved slowly over time,” said Craig Reinerman, a sociology professor and drug policy expect at the University of California Santa Cruz. “At first they had a national commission, much like the Nixon administration had. And their national commission said, ‘look, all drugs have risks, even legal ones. Some are acceptable, and some are just too high.’”

Because history suggested people would use marijuana regardless of the limits imposed by the government, the Dutch tried to manage use as part of an attempt to keep transactions as safe as possible. (They have a similar philosophy when it comes to prostitution).

Dutch law enforcement will not go after coffee shops that sell small amounts of marijuana (up to five grams) to people over the age of 18, though the coffee shops can only operate if the local municipality allows it. The coffee shops can only keep 500 grams of marijuana onsite at any one time, can’t advertize, can’t sell alcohol or hard drugs and can be shut down if they become a nuisance to the neighborhood. Customers are permitted to consume the drug on the premises or at their home.

WATCH: Dutch Doctor Frederick Polak talks to CBSNews.com about the relationship between repression and use.

WATCH: An American cannabis tour guide talks to CBSNews.com about drug tourism in Amsterdam.

In addition, if not for international treaties designed to restrict supply, the Dutch may well have crafted a policy in which the supply side is (at the very least) de facto legal as well, according to Boekhout van Solinge. In the current system the state can only generate tax revenue indirectly, via the incomes of those who run the coffee shops. And many proprietors have little choice but to engage in somewhat shadowy transactions in order to secure the product.

“The fact that production and supply are still left in the underground certainly creates some problems,” said Bruce Mirken at the Marijuana Policy Project.

Over the years, Dutch policy has prompted serious grousing from neighbors. In the 1990s, French president Jacques Chirac suggested the country’s position was weakening Europe-wide efforts to combat drug use. One of his allies in the legislature went so far as to dub Holland a “narco-state.” Holland has long fought illegal drug trafficking, yet remains a significant producer of a number of drugs and a key entry point for narcotics into Europe.

Yet as defenders of the Dutch policy are all too happy to point out, the Dutch actually smoke less pot than many of their neighbors – the French included. According to the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, 22.6 percent of Dutch citizens between ages 15 and 64 reported having used cannabis in their lifetime. In France, the percentage in that age group who reported using the drug was nearly four points higher – 26.2 percent.

Among Spaniards the lifetime usage rate for this age group is even higher – 28.6 percent – while among Italians it sits at a relatively robust 29.3 percent. In the United Kingdom, where the sample included 16 through 59 year olds, the percentage who said they had used cannabis was above 30 percent.

For the record, the country with the most liberal drug policy in Europe is actually Portugal – which happens to have the lowest rate of lifetime marijuana use in the entire European Union. (But that’s a different story.)

In the United States, meanwhile, more than 40 percent of people 18 and older have used marijuana or hashish. America boasts one of the highest pot usage rates in the world.

“If you look at the data, it really dispels any notion that allowing adults to possess marijuana creates a nation of potheads,” Merkin said.
Dutch public opinion over the nation’s drug policy has long been split, with polls usually suggesting that a slim majority favor the coffee shop-based system. In recent years, however, the country has moved to become more restrictive, thanks in large part to resentment over the impact of so-called “drug tourists,” whose partying has long angered locals.

In 2007, the Netherlands banned the use of psychedelic mushrooms (which had essentially been treated as soft drugs) after a drug-related suicide, and several municipalities have moved to close coffee shops to discourage crime and drug tourism. The U.S. Department Of Justice says that 81 percent of the country’s municipalities did not allow coffee shops as far back as 2000. One Dutch professor predicts there will be no more coffee shops in Holland by 2010, thanks in large part to anger over drug tourists.

One of the key debates around pot policy in Holland, the U.S. and elsewhere centers on the question of destigmatization – whether or not giving the drug the imprimatur of legality will drive up usage rates. Joel W. Hay, a Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Economics & Policy at the University Of Southern California and an opponent of marijuana legalization, says yes.

“A lot of people are now getting the clear social signal that pot is not that great because it is illegal” in the United States, he said. “It certainly doesn’t deter use, but it probably deters a substantial amount, and that’s for the good.”

But Reinerman argues that destigmatization is a “tricky question.”

“I interviewed a Dutch parent once and asked about this, and he told me, ‘my son will smoke a little pot now and then, but mostly it doesn’t occur to him to do that. There’s no allure of the forbidden fruit,’” he said.

Reinerman allows that “in the first six months or a year or two [after legalization] there might be an increase” in marijuana use, but says the destigmitization that would come with legalization ultimately works both ways. “Availability is not destiny,” he argues.

Peter Reuter, a University of Maryland professor of criminology, believes that any increase in usage rates if marijuana were decriminalized would be modest. He points to the fact that Dutch marijuana users tend to give up the drug at the same time as Americans do – in their 20s.

“I’m reasonably confident that if we followed the Dutch model we would not see a big uptick in usage,” he said.

That could depend, however, on whether the United States could successfully follow one aspect of the Dutch policy that both legalization advocates and opponents laud: its ban on advertising. Hay notes that under a legalization policy business interests would be incentivized to try to drive up demand.

In the United States, he argues, a policy that bans advertising on legal marijuana would raise questions of Constitutionality. (Congress and the Obama administration did recently pass legislation more strictly limiting tobacco advertising.)

“I think it would be tightly contested whether restrictions could be put on it, because the adverse health effects are not that great,” said Reuter. “Potential producers could bring suit.”

These sorts of complex questions are being seriously considered in some American circles for the first time since the 1970s. The federal government, however, is not exactly joining the conversation. Though new drug czar Gil Kerlikowske has been lauded for his emphasis of treatment over incarceration – and for abandoning the phrase “war on drugs” – he recently told Rolling Stone that legalization is not something worth considering “under any circumstances.”

Hay believes there is simply no good reason to abandon the status quo and emulate the Dutch policy, let alone move to full legalization.

“We have a philosophical question if potheads should be able to [use marijuana], and they sort of already can,” he said. “It’s not really that illegal right now. And I think having society saying this is something you shouldn’t do, but we don’t throw the book at you when you do it, is sort of a socially optimal policy.”

But while medical marijuana use has been decriminalized in some areas of the country, police still arrest between 750,000 and 900,000 people per year on marijuana-related charges, the vast majority for possession.

“It just should be accepted that cannabis is consumed by hundreds of millions of people around the world,” said Boekhout van Solinge. “When governments arrest people, it hasn’t stopped people from consuming cannabis.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Is Cutting-Edge Marijuana Lab the Future of Legitimate Pot?

30 December, 09:38, by admin Tags: , , ,

At downtown Oakland’s Harborside Health Center, the hairy green buds have numbers. The new nomenclature beckons viewers from within seven gleaming glass display cases. Antiseptic white placards boast authoritative black digits. Each stands erect next to a Petri dish of high-octane “White Rhino” or “Afgooey Super Melt.” They read: 7 percent, 11 percent, 18 percent, or 21 percent. Even 80 percent.

“80 percent THC?” asks a potential customer. He’s referring to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol — the main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana.

“That’s a concentrate,” reminds Stephen DeAngelo, proud owner of the three-year-old collective. DeAngelo’s facility boasts 20,000 members and grossed more than $10 million last year. Even amid the recession, lines are a constant phenomenon and DeAngelo is looking to double his space. Hundreds of new customers sign up monthly, attracted partly by the immaculate facility: its savvy, well-paid “budtenders” and $40, eighth-ounce pot dosages. But part of the appeal is the new placards — the result of a disruptive new service by Harborside’s partners at the Analytical Laboratory Project.

“For the first time in the 3,000-year history of human cannabis consumption, consumers will be provided a scientific assessment of the safety and potency of products prior to ingesting them,” DeAngelo announced in December.

In the months since, DeAngelo’s patrons have enjoyed mankind’s most detailed product information thanks to the country’s first commercial marijuana lab. Arrest and jail remain a constant worry for him and the lab’s two owners. But they believe that if pot is truly medicine, it needs quality assurance and dosage information. The Analytical Laboratory Project wants to be the source of that information. The lab’s ultimate goal is to provide testing for half of the 300 dispensaries in California.

Behind DeAngelo, a cross section of the East Bay shuffles in and out of the pot club’s well-lit main floor. They buy briskly and nonchalantly, as though it’s a bank or a pharmacy. Powerful, normative forces have begun to transform the $65 billion domestic black market in ganja. DeAngelo and his partners want to be the custodians of that transformation.

Indeed, positive hits for pathogenic mold are already changing grower operations. “You smoke ten random samples of cannabis and you’ve most likely smoked aspergillus [mold],” said Dave, one of the lab’s two founders. “It’s in there, often at unacceptable levels. Now it’s up to the industry to respond. We also are not in a position where we want to make enemies and piss people off. We want to see it happen in the best way for the movement and the industry to kind of just naturally evolve.”

While the distributed nature of California’s cannabis supply network obviously benefits mom-and-pop growers, it doesn’t encourage quality assurance. Consequently, Dave and his peers believe that some pot consumers are in danger.

“It’s expensive to test every single thing that comes through the door — that’s the price you pay with a decentralized supply system,” Dave said. “But that’s what you’ve got. You’ve got five pounds coming from here and two from there and one individual. I mean, a dog walks in the grow room, and wags its tail — anything can be coming off that dog’s tail. It’s gross. Fertilizers with E. coli. Compost teas that they don’t make right, anaerobic tea that has elevated levels of E. coli and salmonella. It has to come. There’s no way that this is sustainable. All it takes is one story of immune-compromised people dying from aspergillus infection. The myth that cannabis hasn’t killed a single person in 3,000 years is allowed to go on. Well, it’s not cannabis that kills people, it’s all the shit that’s in it.”

Talk about a buzz kill.

——————————————————————————–

Backstage in the bowels of Harborside, the air is thick with terpenoids — the pungent, unmistakable odor molecules of cannabis. Rick Pfrommer, Harborside’s hefty linebacker of a pot buyer, mans the “intake” room where the collective’s 400 growers wholesale to the club in eye-popping one-, two-, or five-pound bags. Everyone from mom-and-pop operators with their dogs to professional growers from Oakland warehouses wait daily in an antechamber before being ushered in one at a time.

It is here, surrounded by file cabinets, computers, and posters featuring holographic closeups of buds, that the medicine begins its long road to the sales counter. It starts with paperwork and a small plastic-bagged test sample. Analytical Laboratory Project cofounders and operators Dave and Addison usually show up in the afternoon to pick up the day’s new samples to test. Both are in their early thirties, and dressed casually. They have a mentor-student relationship with DeAngelo, who is sort of a legend in these parts.

“He’s older and he’s this personality,” Dave said. “We take a lot of guidance from him.”

DeAngelo is in his fifties and wears a long-sleeve shirt, tie, and corduroy pants with two gray ponytails peaking out from underneath a little fedora. The Washington, DC-born drug reformer and charter member of Americans for Safe Access moved out West in 2000 after founding and selling the industrial hemp company Ecolution in the ’90s. After the passage of Prop. 215, which legalized medical marijuana in California, DeAngelo grew medical cannabis but was shocked at the thugs running dispensaries.

“They seemed to have more in common with buying drugs down an alley in a bad city than it did with going into a medical facility and getting medicine,” he recalled. So after Oakland cracked down on such facilities, DeAngelo decided to lead by example. “I couldn’t think of anything more important to advance the cause than to provide a model of safe, affordable cannabis distribution that would be respectful not only of the patients but also of the neighbors and the community as a whole.”

In 2005, DeAngelo began the process of complying with Oakland’s rigorous new permitting process. He spent $400,000 over eleven months and received one of only four coveted permits. Harborside opened on October 3, 2006, the very day the federal Drug Enforcement Agency was raiding pot clubs in San Francisco. “I always expected I might face that moment of truth, but I didn’t expect it five minutes after we opened,” he said.

However, the cops never came to Harborside, and DeAngelo’s facility thrived. The place was well on its way to doubling in size and scope when DeAngelo met Addison and Dave at a National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) conference in Los Angeles in October 2007. Addison was a young grower, dispensary operator, and activist with a wife, two kids, and a rap sheet. Dave grew up in New York, went to Columbia University, dropped out to trade stocks and bought land in Northern California. Jaded on hedge funds by 2001, Dave took a vision quest to Alaska and ended up in Eugene, Oregon before being lured south by medical cannabis. Both consider themselves black sheep of their families. “Nothing surprises them from me anymore,” Dave said.

The two friends wanted to make a living by making a difference. DeAngelo wanted to give his patients better information, start self-regulating medical cannabis, and break new ground in research.

“We were entrepreneurs looking for a good idea and something that’s not totally fucked,” said Dave, who concedes no formal training as a chemist. “This seemed like a really good fit.”

But the work is still highly illegal, despite the Obama administration’s recent announcement that it will not raid cannabis clubs in states that have legalized medical marijuana. Law enforcement raids continue on the West Coast and publicity could draw unwanted attention. But DeAngelo, Dave, and Addison believe in their mission and say they have nothing to hide. They want to make a bold statement and gain customers, even though the lab’s two operators are only willing to provide their first names at this time.

“The attorneys that I’ve spoken to have expressed a level of concern about the safety of the lab and strongly advised us to keep it very hidden,” DeAngelo said. “Simply the process of collecting samples and taking that to the lab and analyzing them — there’s several federal charges that could be placed against somebody. The feds might very well, if they find out the location of our lab, come and raid it, close it down. In order to stick it in the gas chromatograph you have to handle the cannabis itself. And handling cannabis whether or not it’s in a medical form or not is illegal under federal law. They also consider, if you publicize the potency of a particular controlled substance, they consider it a marketing effort for the controlled substance. Then you’re aiding and abetting the distribution of an illegal substance.”

Addison and Dave wanted to go though with it anyway. “I’ve lived the last ten years on the tip of the spear,” Dave said. “This is a different flavor.”

DeAngelo sees it as a crime of necessity. “If cannabis is going to become an accepted mainstream medicine, this is a necessary type of step,” he said. “It has to happen. When the three of us met, it was kind of a fortuitous meeting. And I agreed to do everything that I could, and everything Harborside could, to help facilitate the project. My belief is that cannabis is not only going to be an extremely important medicine but a source of other extremely important medicines. I think that this is going to change everything from the way dispensaries intake medicine from people. It’s going to change the way that we sell medicine to people, it’s going to change the way that patients evaluate and make their purchases. It’s going to change the way that scientists look at this substance.”

After all, it’s already changing the way that growers look at it.

“Most are happy to hear about it,” buyer Pfrommer said. “I’ve had to refuse to take from current batches of stuff until people could clean their room and go through a new run, and we got a couple of people in that process now. The THC ratings are big, but it’s already a big competition amongst vendors to get their medicine in here. For those of us that have been doing this for four decades, this is extremely exciting. We’ve moved past the Cheech and Chong era of being treated a certain way to recognizing the economic and scientific impact of cannabis.”

——————————————————————————–

DeAngelo recently arranged for a tour of the small, garage-size facility today as it ran gas chromatography, flame ionization, and mass spectrometry tests on local pot.

Addison and Dave packed up little samples in a Tupperware container and talk about getting a coffee on the way to the lab for the night’s work. While Addison weaved his rusted ’80s minivan through Oakland’s surface streets amid heavy afternoon traffic, Dave details the history, methodology development, and hurdles of opening a pot lab. They spent a year boning up on organic chemistry, talking to Ph.D potheads in the medical underground, buying gear, and practicing.

“Everyone was talking about, ‘Oh, you can’t do it’, or, ‘We’ve been thinking about that forever’,” Addison recalled. “But no one had done it!”

Harborside provided the test medicine to calibrate the pair’s off-the-shelf lab equipment. First they had to learn how to set up the equipment and run it. After a friend mentioned problems with contamination in tobacco, they also added a test for mold. The duo did not borrow any methodology from government labs, because cannabis research tends to be locked away. “None of this came out of the literature,” Dave noted.

The East Bay’s first pot lab looks like a bachelor pad with a locked room in the back. The building is of recent construction with high ceilings and stained carpets, mismatched furniture, and a congenial guard dog, belonging to Addison.

It’s a little cooler in the locked back room. The place hums like the inside of a busy copy store. The lab’s centerpiece — the gas chromatograph — squats on a work bench in the back studded with yellow samples in a carousel feeding into an auto-sampler. Inside the device, a flame ion detector and mass spectrometer offer two different snapshots of the prepared samples. Underneath, an $80,000 hydrogen generator hums a steady supply into the chromatograph. Tanks of oxygen and air also feed the device. Off to one side, a monitor flicks line graphs. Books from Agilent Tech, Sigma Life Sciences, and Aldrich Chemistry line the bookshelf.

Dave runs through the process of documenting and preparing the sample. The gas chromatograph needs just a microliter-size sample to test; less than a rain drop. So the lab’s main methodology turns the sample packets of green bud into a diluted liquid extraction. First, the lab tech does the paperwork, and dons gloves and gear. Addison chops up a half-gram under a sterile hood and places the sample in a vial, then adds a controlled amount of Hexane — a special-use solvent.

The mix goes into a sonicator, an ultra-sonic jeweler’s tool. It vibrates at a high enough frequency to rupture the cell membranes of the plant. The liquid is then diluted to just hundredths of a percent and an extraction is loaded into a little test vial.

Rows and rows of vials are then fed into the gas chromatograph on a timer. Inside the machine it’s like CSI — but for ganja.

“A gas chromatograph is not a detector — it’s only used for separating compounds,” Dave said. “The way it separates compounds is it uses heat.” The finely controlled oven can increase its temperature by just a single degree Celsius over the course of fifteen minutes, which makes it possible to measure the exact temperature at which a compound degrades. Different compounds vaporize at different temperatures, where they can be detected by the flame ionization detector and mass spectrometer.

The mass spectrometer is way more sensitive and expensive, requiring a library that you buy from a chemistry supply company to even decode the results. This step took the longest, Dave said. “It wasn’t too difficult, you just have to socially engineer your way through a chemical company,” he said. “And it’s hard to open any new chemical accounts after 9-11.”

The run takes ten minutes while agar plate cultures for mold will take at least 48 hours. The whole process costs $100 per sample and the nightly work of preparing samples and cleaning proves tedious. Lab tech positions start at $15 per hour. “Mass spectrometers do not like to smoke pot,” Dave said. “They don’t. They can, but it takes a lot of maintenance.”

Back in the front room with Addison’s dog, wall maps of California are marked with dispensary locations. The two have big plans for their lab — the first of which is to move it. But their process has several flaws: cleanliness, trust, scalability, industry acceptance, and scientific validity.

First off, Addison’s dog cannot be on the premises, especially if they are going to tut-tut growers about allowing dogs in their grow rooms. The lab also has carpeting, which can be a vector for mold. Someone from the canonical Journal of the American Medical Association might rip their methodology to shreds, starting with the sterility of the intake at Harborside. Addison and his peers say that about 5 percent of the supply is contaminated with mold. But getting people to believe their findings and change their ways at the cannabis sales counter will be an uphill battle.

“We need a new lab space,” Dave conceded. “We need more lab coats. We need equipment that will make our methodology bulletproof. And that all costs money.”

Dave says that a respected yet anonymous chemist at Lawrence Livermore Labs — “a triple Ph.D” — validated their methodology and process three different ways. “It all came in very, very accurate. Commercial labs operate with — believe it or not — a 30 percent variance. We’ve gotten ours down to 5 percent, plus or minus, and it’s appropriate for medical applications.”

Like most forensics, it gets the job done but it’s not canonical science.

“Ultimately we need accreditation,” Dave said. “We can only do it to the best of our ability. We don’t have literature to really stand on. It’s all an exploration and the best you can do. Generally, the THC results can vary but not that much. Top-tier stuff doesn’t come up in the bottom tier.

“We’re sort of like whistleblowers a little bit. Even though we’re friends and work with all of the other people, we don’t know where that’s going to lead us. The industry itself is having an identity crisis. Competitive forces are going to drive it to being an industry. But that’s going to drive it toward regulation, control, making sure that the products are safe especially since they are being distributed under medical auspices. And there’s a lot of concerns.”

——————————————————————————–

Back at Harborside, in the fading twilight, supplies are running low but the lines remain strong. Customers of every age, race, class, and creed buy, peer at the data in bound notebooks, and sign racks of petitions at the activism station. Others write letters to imprisoned drug felons — aka “POWs” — or members of Congress. Free yoga and acupuncture classes are beginning in a few minutes.

Elan, the dispensary floor director who asks to be identified by his first name only, said most people choosing a strain of pot ask, “What’s the best?” He typically replies that it depends on what your needs are medicinally, economically, and preferentially. Anxiety? Chronic pain? How much do you have to spend? Concentrate or bud? The lab results have become yet another tool for consumer choice.

“This is the sharpest tool in the workbox now and this is all alpha phase,” Elan said. “This isn’t even beta. This is first draft all the way around.”

Elan said patients are using the new information to get less high and more mellow, drawing correlations between the main psychoactive ingredient THC and other non-psychoactive cannabinoids cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabinol (CBN).

“We’re finding out CBD has an extremely medical effect but a non-psychoactive effect, and a lot of people really want that,” Elan said. “A forty-year-old businessman doesn’t want to get high. He needs the pain relief. They’re able to do that with the books behind the bar.”

Will, an East Bay resident in the advertising industry, said he met the lab’s results with a skepticism that’s been conquered by time. “I have more faith in this place than I do in peanuts right now, and I’m becoming less of a pothead.”

The 32-year-old Will is a closeted toker who came in a year ago for migraines and because he liked pot. He found Harborside clean and less pricey than many thugged-out places in Los Angeles. “I thought, literally, ‘I’m in Entourage. This is the cleanest pharmacy I’ve ever been in. It’s nice, clean, safe, and well-lit.”

But trial and error with some of Harborside’s wares left Will super-baked at inopportune moments. So when the numbers showed up, “I was like, ‘Oh, what’s this? Really cool. Is this for real? Are these real percentages? How did you get these percentages?’ And it helped me quickly pick my price range. A lot of times you want a lower-price medicinal marijuana that has a higher THC. I was questioning it for a little bit but as I kept coming back and saw the numbers kind of stay legit and not shift and things like this, I thought, ‘Oh, this is really nice.’ I felt comfortable. It makes it easy. You have such a selection that you want to look at it all and smell it all and it helps you narrow it down.”

“Ford,” a longtime local grower, patient, and activist who was writing letters to men and women in jail at the activism station, said the lab is changing people’s habits. He’s growing a strain of pot known as OG Kush and shows off pictures of his “babies.”

“I’m thinking about bringing in my next batch for testing, ’cause I’m curious.”

Ford said there is a lot of the marijuana equivalent of bathtub gin out there. He believes that testing will cause growers to take more care. “I’ve been involved and dropped out of bad operations,” he said. “You can’t have your dog near the plant, man. Dogs and plants don’t mix.”

In the final analysis, it’s hard to think of any system more antithetical to the closed US drug-development system than contemporary US cannabis production. Bringing the two in line means the annihilation of one culture or the other. Which will win?

“Those two worlds are going to come together,” Dave said. “The DEA has to accept it, and we as an industry have to go to a model that is more acceptable, more palatable for mainstream society.”

The Analytical Laboratory Project is in the process of writing custom software for a lab management system. “Ultimately, this stuff will end up getting published, I think,” DeAngelo said. “People are dying because of a lack of research.”

Within the next month or so, Dave said the lab intends to branch out to thirteen Bay Area clubs. “If I had ten customers like Harborside, I’d be a rich man,” Dave said with a laugh. “We know them all, and they want to do it.” After that, he said, the lab will seek a special license from the City of Oakland.

An independent certification system consisting of specific labels and stickers is being developed for participating customers. Participants will also have to consent to undergo occasional audits, in which an undercover shopper obtains samples so that the lab can ensure that its labels haven’t been copied or swapped.

Dig it: Analytical Labs wants to drug test pot clubs.

“If you want to be part of the testing program, that’s what you have to do,” DeAngelo said. “Because it’s not just a marketing thing, it is about collecting this research. So the research has to be valid, we have to take these steps to make it valid.”

Within a few years, the goal is to have tens of thousands of potential research subjects reporting coded results on surveys, the testing of tinctures and edibles, pesticides tests, and strain profiles correlated to effect and illness.

The Center and the lab fit into broader plans for legal change. The nonprofit Harborside Health Center gives thousands of dollars each year to activist groups like NORML. A fraction of every lazy, pothead dollar is being funneled into an engine for legislative reform.

“If every dispensary in the state of California would give the proportion of the money that they take in to the movement as Harborside does: the job would be done by now,” DeAngelo said. “I want to see the law requiring cannabis to match the reality of what this plant is.”

Ultimately, DeAngelo and his partners seek to fundamentally alter the consciousness of cannabis use in America.

“No commercial research is allowed on cannabis before it can be considered a safe/effective medicine but then the government will not allow that door to open,” DeAngelo said. “So we’re just going to do an end run around them. We’ve got the cannabis, we’ve got the patients, and now we’ve got the scientific expertise. This is too important.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Cannabis ‘may’ guard against osteoporosis

29 December, 13:36, by admin Tags: ,

CANNABIS could protect bones from weakening in later life, scientists said today.
A study on mice showed that while properties of the plant can reduce strength in the young, it may guard against osteoporosis.

Researchers at the University of Edinburgh said a molecule in the body, which can be activated by cannabis, is “key” to the development of the bone disease.

It was not previously known whether the results would be positive or negative.

The study on mice showed that compounds similar to those found in cannabis decreased bone loss in older mice and prevented the accumulation of fat in bones.

The same study showed an increase in the rate bone tissue was destroyed in young mice.

The university said bone disease affects up to 30% of women and 12% of men at some point in life.

Stuart Ralston, the Arthritis Research Campaign professor of rheumatology at the university, said: “This is an exciting step forward, but we must recognise that these are early results and more tests are needed on the effects of cannabis in humans to determine how the effects differ with age in people.

“We plan to conduct further trials soon and hope the results will help to deliver new treatments that will be of value in the fight against osteoporosis.”

Prof Ralston said that smoking cannabis with tobacco is “bad at any age” for bones.

He said the “psychotropic effects” of the drug “might increase the risk of falls” for an older person – which could also lead to broken bones.
He added: “The ideal way forward would be to develop a cannabis-type drug that did not go to the brain but was targeted to the periphery

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Cannabis smoking Wiki (from WikiPedia)

29 December, 12:24, by admin Tags: ,

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A narrow screened single-toke midwakh (shown here) or kiseru provides low-temperature 25 mg servings, avoiding the health risk of hot-burning cigarette papers.Cannabis smoking refers to the process of inhaling the vapors released by the combustion of the flowers and subtending leafs and stems of the pistillate Cannabis plants, known as marijuana. Alternatively, the cannabis plant flowers when sifted releasing trichomes, which contain high amounts of THC and other cannabinoids, which are then pressed and baked, known as hashish. Cannabis is consumed recreationally to produce a feeling of relaxation or euphoria or for medical reasons (such as to relieve stress or suppress nausea).

Smoking releases the main psychoactive chemical in cannabis, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), which is absorbed into the bloodstream via the lungs. It then mostly targets the brain, where it binds to cannabinoid receptors. The immune system also contains cannabinoid receptors and may negatively impact its function.[1] The cannabinoid receptors receive the THC and other cannabinoids, setting off a chain reaction, leading to the feeling of a mental “high,” which varies strongly by person. Studies have also found that the heating of cannabis (which can be achieved without combustion by means of a vaporizer) results in the production of additional THC from the decarboxylation of the non-psychoactive Δ9-tetrahydrocanabinoid acid (THCa)[2].

While cannabis can be consumed orally, the bioavailability characteristics and effects of this method are different from smoking. The effect takes longer to begin, is typically longer-lasting, and can sometimes result in a more powerful psychoactive effect.[3]

Cannabis can be smoked in a variety of pipe-like implements, including bowls, bongs, chillums and one-hitters, or by rolling it into a cigarette-like “joint” or cigar-like “blunt”.[4]

Smoking pipes, sometimes called pieces or bowls, can be made of blown glass, wood, ceramic, broscillate, stone, or metal. Blown-glass pipes and bongs are often intricately and colorfully designed, and can contain materials that change color or become more vivid with repeated use. A screen is added to prevent drawing small particles (“shooters”) down to clog the channel.

[edit] Bong
Main article: Bong

A hand-blown glass bongA bong is a pipe with a small water-chamber known as a “bubbler” [5] through which the cannabis smoke passes prior to inhalation. Users fill the bong with water in order to cool the smoke and filter out particulate matter, sometimes also adding ice or using substances such as brandy in place of water. Ash Catchers, Diffusors, Percolators, and Carbon Filters are being seen more and more in modern glass bongs. [6] Bongs may have a hole which is covered with a finger during inhalation and then uncovered to clear the pipe of smoke; slang names for this include: carb (short for carburetor), rush-hole, choke, “clear hole” or just “clear”, shotgun, and shotty.

Vaporizer
Since the delivery of THC occurs through heating rather than combustion, it is possible to “smoke” small servings of sifted cannabis without ever igniting the herb, through the use of a “vaporizer.” This maximizes consumption of active cannabinoids while minimizing the harmful and irritating effects of actual smoke.[7]

At least one study has shown that using a vaporizer results in reduced tar and carbon monoxide inhalation compared to smoking the same amount of cannabis.[8]

[edit] Joint
Main article: Joint (cannabis)
A joint or sometimes called a “spliff” or a “doobie” is created by rolling up cannabis, either manually or with a rolling machine, into paper, forming a cigarette-like product.

[edit] Blunt
A Blunt, sometimes known as a “Gar”, “rillo” or “L”, is ground cannabis rolled with a cigar wrapper (tobacco leaf).[9] Blunts are usually rolled using low quality cigars or blunt wraps. [10]

[edit] Shotgun
Main article: Shotgun (cannabis)
A shotgun (also known as a backfire, shotty, brainer, charge, powerhit, super, or blowback) refers to one user taking a “hit” of a blunt or joint (see below), turning it around so the lit end is inside the mouth, and blowing the hit out through the blunt/joint into the mouth of another user, who sucks it in. It is also common to take a hit and blow it directly into the other person’s mouth. A “Stinger” has the same concept except smoke is inhaled through the nasal passage.

[edit] “Spots”
Main article: Spots (cannabis)
An alternative vaporization method, known variously as spots, spotting, dots, hot knives, or blades, is to compress a small amount of cannabis between two heated metal blades and inhale the resulting vapors.[11]

[edit] Mixing with other herbs
Often cannabis is combined with tobacco (also known as “Spinning”, “Batching”, “Webacco”, and “Amsterdam Style”) or alternative smokable herbs[12], such as hops flowers, peppermint leaf, etc., in a joint or spliff.

Mixing with tobacco is more common in Europe and the Middle East than in the Americas. For some users this practice is said to have an instant and more intense effect than smoking cannabis by itself, but at least one source has suggested that it can lead to nicotine dependence[13]

[edit] Health effects
Main article: Effects of cannabis
[edit] Lung cancer
Main article: Effects of cannabis: Cancer risk
A major 2006 study compared the effects of tobacco and Cannabis smoke on the lungs.[14][15] The outcome of the study showed that even very heavy cannabis smokers “do not appear to be at increased risk of developing lung cancer,”[15] while the same study showed a twenty-fold increase in lung cancer risk for tobacco smokers who smoked two or more packs of tobacco cigarettes a day.[14][15] It is known that Cannabis smoke, like all smoke, contains carcinogens and thus has a probability of triggering lung cancer. THC, unlike nicotine, is thought to “encourage aging cells to die earlier and therefore be less likely to undergo cancerous transformation.”[15] Cannabidiol (CBD), an isomer of THC and another major cannabinoid that also grows on cannabis, has been reported elsewhere to have anti-tumor properties as well. However, in that report, some cellular abnormalities were documented showing an increase in lung cancer risk in very heavy users.[16]

[edit] References
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Cannabis smoking
^ http://lupus.webmd.com/news/20030415/cannabis-may-suppress-immune-system
^ Verhoeckx KC, Korthout HA, van Meeteren-Kreikamp AP, Ehlert KA, Wang M, van der Greef J, Rodenburg RJ, Witkamp RF (2006-04-06). Unheated Cannabis sativa extracts and its major compound THC-acid have potential immuno-modulating properties not mediated by CB1 and CB2 receptor coupled pathways. International Immunopharmacology. PMID 16504929.
^ http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/cannabis_effects.shtml
^ United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2006), World Drug Report, 1, pp. 187–192, ISBN 92-1-148214-3, http://www.unodc.org/pdf/WDR_2006/wdr2006_chap2_annex1.pdf, retrieved 2007-11-22
^ [1]
^ [2]
^ [3]
^ DI Abrams, et al. (2007). “Vaporization as a Smokeless Cannabis Delivery System: A Pilot Study” (pdf). Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 82. http://www.maps.org/media/vaporizer_epub.pdf.
^ http://www.nida.nih.gov/infofacts/marijuana.html
^ http://www.drugabuse.gov/PDF/PARENTS_Marijuana_brochure.pdf
^ “Cannabis use in a drug and alcohol clinic population”, McBride A. J. 1994
^ http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Smoking_Cessation#Herbal_alternatives
^ Australian Government Department of Health: National Cannabis Strategy Consultation Paper, page 4. “Cannabis has been described as a ‘Trojan Horse’ for nicotine addiction, given the usual method of mixing cannabis with tobacco when preparing marijuana for administration.”
^ a b Boyles, Salynn. “Pot Smoking Not Linked to Lung Cancer,” WebMED Health News. May 23, 2006. (Retrieved 2009-09-05.)
^ a b c d “Study Finds No Link Between Marijuana Use and Lung Cancer,” American Thoracic Society. May 2006. (Retrieved 2009-09-05.)
^ Armentano, Paul. “Cannabis Smoke and Cancer: Assessing the Risk,” NORML: Working to reform marijuana laws. No publication date. (Retrieved 2009-09-05.)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Legalization Of Marijuana

18 December, 03:47, by admin Tags: , ,
Policymakers in the United States claim that marijuana use is hazardous, often leading to the use of more potent drugs, such as cocaine and heroin. As of 2000, eight states had passed laws allowing seriously ill patients to take marijuana as a prescription pain-control substance. However, people who grow, buy, or use the drug for such purposes can be arrested and prosecuted under federal law.

Marijuana is the product of Cannabis sativa, a hemp plant, and it refers specifically to the plant’s leaves and flowers. Used for centuries as a painkiller, it has become popular as a recreational drug that produces a general feeling of well-being. Marijuana is known by a variety of alternative names—including marihuana, pot, weed, and grass. It is illegal in most countries, although some nations have lowered the penalties for owning or using small amounts of the drug. Movements have formed to legalize marijuana, at least for medical purposes, but critics of such efforts argue that the drug does more harm than good.

Usually dried, crushed, and smoked in pipes or hand-rolled cigarettes, marijuana can also be consumed in food or drink. Users may experience both physical and psychological effects. Physical effects range from red eyes and dry mouth to an increased heart rate and loss of coordination. Some effects—including relief from pain and nausea, increased appetite, and reduced muscle spasms—are considered beneficial for medical conditions such as cancer, AIDS, and multiple sclerosis.
Psychological effects may involve hallucinations, impaired judgment, and mood swings. Some studies have linked marijuana use to short-term memory problems. Although marijuana does not cause physical addiction, users can develop a psychological dependence on the drug.

A treaty called the International Opium Convention of 1925 was the first attempt to control the international trade in marijuana. In the years that followed, many countries passed laws against growing, selling, possessing, or using marijuana. In the United States, the possession and use of marijuana was declared illegal in 1937. Marijuana is currently regulated under the Controlled Substances Act, part of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse and Control Act of 1970. This federal law classifies marijuana as a Schedule I drug, which means that it has no safe medical use and a high potential for abuse. Despite these regulations, marijuana is the most widely used illegal drug in the country. In 2000, about 14 million Americans were current users of illicit, or illegal drugs, and 76 percent of them reported using marijuana, according to the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse.

Some European countries have decriminalized the use of marijuana, regarding the drug as no more harmful than cigarettes and alcohol. Policymakers in the United States, by contrast, claim that marijuana is hazardous, often leading to the use of more potent drugs such as cocaine and heroin. As of 2000, eight states had passed laws allowing seriously ill patients to take marijuana as a prescription pain-control substance. However, people who grow, buy, or use the drug for such purposes can be arrested and prosecuted under federal law. Some argue that permitting marijuana to be used for medical purposes would lead to an increase in recreational use and pressure to legalize the drug.

In some parts of the United States, farmers have lobbied to legalize the growing of hemp, a plant related to marijuana that has industrial uses as a fiber. However, their efforts have been unsuccessful due to the association of hemp with marijuana.

COPYRIGHT 2007 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Point of View 1: Marijuana Should Be Legalized Because Its Prohibition Unnecessarily Taxes Law Enforcement
The responsible use of marijuana should be legalized since it is fundamentally no more dangerous than the use of legal drugs such as tobacco and alcohol. Evidence is lacking in regard to both marijuana’s addictive quality and its potential as a gateway drug. Because of investigations, arrests, trials, and incarcerations involving marijuana, law enforcement and judicial resources are unnecessarily burdened. Millions of Americans who smoke marijuana with little negative impact on society at large are threatened by a climate where the penalties for engaging in marijuana use are too severe. The currently illegal marijuana trade promotes crime by contributing to a dangerous black market for unregulated marijuana. A policy that allows for the decriminalization, legalization, and regulation of marijuana use for responsible adults is needed to give Americans freedom of choice in deciding whether to smoke marijuana.

Marijuana use among adults should be allowed in the spirit of the legalization of such drugs as tobacco and alcohol. Prior to the “Marihuana Tax Act” of 1937, people used marijuana without restriction. R. Keith Stroup, executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, argues that the 1937 law was passed in a climate where marijuana was demonized by media and political interests.

The Federal Bureau of Narcotics declared that a marijuana user “becomes a fiend with savage or ‘cave man’ tendencies. His sex desires are aroused and some of the most horrible crimes result. He hears light and sees sound. To get away from it, he suddenly becomes violent and may kill.” Newspapers also made hyperbolic claims; among them the Journal of Law and Criminology reported on the habit of marijuana use, alleging that “[i]f continued, the inevitable result is insanity, which those familiar with it describe as absolutely incurable, and, without exception ending in death.” Throughout the remainder of the century, further legislation resulted in harsh penalties for people possessing, growing, using, or selling marijuana. This legal climate has hampered investigations into the possible benefits of using marijuana to alleviate nausea and suffering caused by certain medical conditions. Although some states have put measures in place that protect citizens from severe consequences for marijuana possession and use, the vast majority recommend jail time or impose stiff fines for convictions.

Law enforcement and judicial resources are disproportionately wasted on crimes involving marijuana. While few argue against arresting irresponsible users of marijuana, many believe that the general effort to restrict its use keeps people from focusing on more severe and violent crimes.

Criminalizing marijuana creates the false impression that it is as dangerous as more addictive drugs of like heroin and cocaine. Making marijuana legal and regulating it would take the criminal element out of its trafficking. Stroup, in testimony before Congress, criticized the disproportionate attention that marijuana offenses receive, stating: “By stubbornly defining all marijuana smoking as criminal, including that which involves adults smoking in the privacy of their home, government is wasting police and prosecutorial resources, clogging courts, filling costly and scarce jail and prison space, and needlessly wrecking the lives and careers of genuinely good citizens.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

The Origin of Marijuana

18 December, 03:46, by admin Tags: ,

For thousands of years, the Cannabis plant was thought to possess powerful healing and regenerative properties. The people of India had long used Cannabis for pleasure, as well as a valued medicinal remedy for the relief of pain. As far back as 2800 BC, Cannabis was regularly used in regions of the Orient to treat illnesses such as rheumatism, gout, and malaria, as well as to expand the creative perception and expression among many of its people.

In 1546 AD, the Spanish brought “marajuana” (Castilian pronunciation) to the shores of America hoping to trade the plant for traditional agricultural products such as cotton and tobacco. Later in 1890, hemp became so popular as a raw textile, in the southern part of the United States hemp actually replaced cotton as the South’s most dominant cash crop.

In the late 1800′s, major American pharmaceutical companies began to include and promote “THC,” the active ingredient in marajuana, in a variety of their drug products and actively merchandized it as a remedy for chronic pain.

In 1914, the United States Congress effectively criminalized the use of marajuana by enacting the Harrison Act, which, ironically, was expressly intended to prohibit the sale of opium and morphine and its derivatives such as cocaine. Nowhere in the Harrison Act did it ever mention marajuana, nor was marajuana ever considered a derivative of either morphine or opium. Notwithstanding, the umbrella of prohibition covered the use of marijuana, and it wasn’t until 1937 that Congress passed the Marajuana Tax Act, which effectively prohibited the use or sale of marijuana for any purpose including medical. This was the beginning of the second greatest American prohibition and perhaps the last.

In the late 1920′s the illegal use of marijuana became more widespread among the underground cultures and among much of the youth. Musicians played jazz in small clubs and used marajuana as a way of stimulating their creativity. As the 1960′s rocked the music world, a strong counter culture was forming against the establishment and against America’s war with Vietnam.

While thousands of US soldiers returned home from Vietnam, many of them more high on pot than when they first left for the war, it became clear that the widespread use of marajuana was gaining momentum not only in the jungles of Vietnam but also on the streets of the Height in San Francisco and on college campuses across the nation. In the 1960′s, marajuana had become associated with the peace movement of the 60′s and it stayed in the American psyche ever since.

In 2003, Canada became the first nation to legally dispense medical marajuana to patients through its socially funded national healthcare system. Other countries viewed it as an official acknowledgement of the medicinal value of marajuana from a leading free world nation. Americans wanted to know why this policy was not being pursued at home.

In 2007, in California, under the Compassionate Use Act, patients were guaranteed safe access to medical marajuana, so long as the patients use was medically documented and approved by a physician in consultation with the patient. As a result, patients in California, and in thirteen other states, no longer have to fear arrest or the threat of prosecution arising out of their use of medical marajuana.

No matter what you think about marjuana, no matter how you pronounce it or spell it, one thing is certain, medical marajuana has a broad range of support from both the citizens and their legislators. The momentum for legalization is growing quickly; so much so, it is starting to feel like the end of prohibition.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter